As AUDCHF hurtles towards the fortified 10159 level of resistance that
remains unbroken since 2008, eyes are open for a potential short! Even this
price is currently above parity (a key psychological barrier on its own), we
can see that the behaviour of price action over the past 4 years validates the
10159 as a far stronger level to contend with. As always, we trade what we see
- not what we think and this looks like a very good 'supply' zone where we can
pre-empt sellers coming back into the market.
A 1.272 Fibonacci extension also overlaps perfectly with 10159.
While you could be forgiven for simply waiting for a reversal bar to confirm
a safer entry, I am going to place an order a little below the level to take
advantage of the 'lightening before the thunder' and getting into the trade at
the most efficient price in a bounce trade where not only is probability 70% in
favour - the reward to risk is significantly more favourable than if it was
traded as a breakout trade.
Nice one Rob. Happy to say that this (almost) exactly the price I've been stalking too.
ReplyDeleteLooks a good one, Rob, and like Adam I am pleased to say that I had a similar level marked on my chart. A little choppy out there at the moment, I've lost a couple recently (step forward, AUD/NZD Short from 2nd July!), so I like the look of this one, being at such a long-standing Resistance level.
ReplyDeleteBear in mind that since the intervention of the SNB last year that this is basically a long EURAUD trade. The previous turn levels were put in before the intervention. I like the level but I'll be keeping a close eye on what the EUR is doing.
ReplyDeleteI have been watching this Pair for a little while, and although it is early, today looks to me as though it could close as an interesting high test. It is a little south of the level you were talking about, but a line through the chart at around 1.0078 or so looks pretty interesting if you go back on the Daily, particularly Spring 2008 & 2010. Could be worth 1% of my money if it looks okay later on...
ReplyDelete